I was discussing last week with my daughter, the value or
necessity of attaching labels to people
and it made me consider the ‘labels’ that I’ve either put on myself or have been
given throughout my life. Apart from the descriptive tags of mother, sister,
etc, these labels can cause a certain behaviour which is expected.
Shakespeare’s in his play ‘As you like it’ wrote-
‘All the world's a stage,
And all the men and women merely players’
And all the men and women merely players’
If I therefore have a label to conform to, am I in control or acting a role for the benefit of others?
I don’t necessarily
object to labels because they can give defined rules, responsibilities and expectations
as my nursing career was governed by the rules of the NMC and my education role
held specific responsibilities and expectations.
My point is, do labels help or hinder? Do we use them too liberally; are they restrictive, controlling, cause us to conform? Or does a label describe a stereotype that we can dismiss so easily?
When I first retired I realised that many of my life long
labels no longer applied which was quite liberating but also made me think how
I had probably been defined by these
labels and now that they did not apply, then ‘who am I now?’ This identity crisis only lasted a couple of
hours because I’ve picked up more replacement labels!! I am now an artist, a
dressmaker, and best of all- a retiree!
So now, if I therefore have a label to conform to, am I in control or acting a role for the benefit of others? I think that I now have the control because I can now decide whether to play on this world stage or just be a spectator – but that’s another label isn’t it?
No comments:
Post a Comment